You are not your product's customer

But building it for you is a great place to start

Editor’s note: this essay tackles a problem my cofounders and I faced a few years ago during my time at Dribble. This conundrum is still prevalent for many founders today. Additionally, I am currently a digital marketer at GoCardless but remain an investor at Dribble.

When building your product, it’s natural for you to build it for yourself. I mean you are building this product to help with a problem you personally want to stamp out of existence, right? At least that’s the case for many.

So building the product for you as a customer is a great place to start.

The needs of a few can skew the needs of many

The early users you acquire buy into your solution with a significant time-investment. Early product releases are never perfect, so the users who stick-it-out become your “power users”, providing valuable feedback (about themselves) to help make a better product (for themselves).

The early employees you bring on will have hopefully found the same value from your solution, as well as, buying into the long term vision of the product, so soon start building features to help maximise the reward for your “power users” (and themselves).

At this stage, you are building a product to solve the problem for you, your early “power users” and your early employees. That’s ideal right?

Yes, but only for a fleeting moment. It’s now time to think bigger.

Market Problem

Your target market

I personally experienced this conundrum when cofounding Dribble at university. Since we had the solution to a niche problem, the logical use-case was to target those just like us, other students. So all growth, acquisition and product development efforts were tailored to them/us.

If we stuck building the product for ourselves and the university lookalikes, we would have failed, since the market problem was not as prevalent for the segment. The real market problem was with a demographic, polar opposite to students….employed people with disposable income (also football fans and regular punters). This was the potential customer base we were missing and not building the product for.

So, we changed our product and messaging to accommodate. Changes included:

• Copy. From millennial slang to more succinct and professional. Like SPORTBible getting a job at Sky Sports

• User journey. To be less around the social side of playing with your friends, to playing to win and making money on the platform

• Acquisition. To target those that require a higher CAC since they are more affluential

• Branding. To suit the professional sports fan rather than the young student (notice how young = ⚡)

Dribble logo 2015 - Dribble logo 2016 (which has now changed again in 2018)

By coming together and working on all (and more) of these changes, we were able to start an ongoing iteration process that lasts today. Thankfully we learnt the lesson laid out by Casey Winters, the growth lead who helped scale Pinterest:

“Your customer focus should always be on new or potential users, not early users”

As Casey mentions, once early value is established, start building the product for the larger market problem. The problem which is incredibly diverse with an insane amount of use-cases. This new product must iterate, grow, evolve to be a living breathing solution to the larger market. Then, and only then, will you have a viable product for the long term.

Dynamic, not static product optimisation is the key.

Shifting away from your early "power users"

Your early "power users" are the dark side

When tackling a problem, you start with trying to monopolise a small niche within the greater market. If you’re a fantasy football app (using our app as an example) you can’t just jump into the whole sports market as you’d immediately be drowned by insane customer acquisition costs.

You start by focusing on a much smaller but highly engaged (daily fantasy) market.

Listening and learning from your early power users will help you reach great heights within your small niche. But remember this is just a small piece within the greater pie. So if you get stuck only listening and catering to their needs, your growth will be stunted since the ceiling of potential is mapped to that small piece.

Shifting your product and customer acquisition efforts to the wider market at the right time and shifting away from the power users, will hold you in good stead to address the much larger opportunity. This should only be done once you’ve reached product market fit.

How do you know when you’ve reached PMF?

In short, it’s when you have a product worth using by at least a sub-segment of the market. Questions to ask yourself:

• Is my retention curve flat after 1, 3 or 6 months (length of time depends on your business model)?

• If I turned off all acquisition and retargeting efforts (including push notifications and email) would there still be healthy usage?

Do note, this essay does not mean you must forget your early adopters. Building a community around the ever growing use-cases and user profiles is the best way to keep engaged your early and current power users.

Conclusion

So, even though your early power users are valuable at the beginning, be aware that they will bias your experiments, skew your data, make it harder to find new users and ask for features to help only their experience. (Note that an increase in power user engagement will be negligible since they’re already using it so frequently.)

The real value is to build the product for your potential customers, focus growth and development on the new users and be the solution to that larger market problem.

-

The aim for this essay is to hopefully dispel any early founders from making a similar mistake my cofounders and I faced. If you found value in this essay and want others to see this, please share.

I really appreciate it!

I'm re-invigorating my LinkedIn profile so feel free to connect. I'm accepting all connections :)

You can find more of my musings about growth, strategy and user acquisition on my site Bright Fund, and if you’re feeling quirky you can even subscribe. Alternatively you can find my Medium publication, Bright Fund.

How To Run A Growth Experiment

Using the G.R.O.W.S method

Editor's note: I promised another prioritisation essay in last week's piece. This is it. Plus more. Much more. Similar to last weeks piece, best results from this approach happen when you have plugged as many holes as you can in that leaky bucket product of yours :)

In order to get the most out of your growth strategies, having a clear cut process in running growth experiments is paramount. As long as you approach this with some scientific methods - allowing any test to be analysed from a quantitative perspective - then you are on a good path. 

A simple scientific experiment outlined below can be found in any secondary school textbook.

Minimum viable experiment

We will use the same concept, just in a more scalable way.

The key here is to have an unbiased decision making process when focusing your time, effort and money into finding your core growth channels. Putting your trust into a scientific growth experiment allows you to follow the data rather than your gut (don't get me wrong, your gut is very intuitive, but it won't be able to consistently tell you whether your multivariate-tests-of-the-future will work). It will ultimately help you make the most informed decisions you can in un-earthing the growth for your business. 

There are a few ways (or anagrams) you can follow for your experiments, however, one that has worked for me is the G.R.O.W.S process, coined by the Growth Tribe out of Amsterdam. 

G.R.O.W.S

The G.R.O.W.S method

The G.R.O.W.S process follows this order:

1. G - Gather Ideas

2. R - Rank Ideas

3. O - Outline Experiments

4. W - Work

5. S - Study Data

Let's dive in to each stage.

G - GATHER IDEAS

Trello board for backlogged ideas across the Pirate Metrics

Creating a company-wide spreadsheet for ideas that popup anytime is great way to start. How I organised our growth backlog is by using the conversion funnel (or pirate metrics) as a guide, going from awareness, acquisition, activation, retention, revenue and referral.

You can take things further by setting up formal brainstorming sessions with the whole company or multiple teams depending on size of co. To get the most out of these sessions, it's best to learn how to brainstorm like a Googler.

Simply put, the growth team ask every individual to brainstorm on their own around a specific stage of the conversion funnel, e.g. user acquisition. Everyone then comes together to flush out the best, most creative and innovative ideas to start ranking. Each person must:

1. Know the user

2. Think 10x

3. Prototype said ideas

R - RANK IDEAS

Next step is to rank or prioritise your ideas. If you take a look at my previous essay on how to prioritise your growth, I map out a prioritisation framework (Bullseye). You can use that or, since we are focusing on experimentation, you can create any simple ranking system to help rank best ideas. Such as:

Who ate all the P.I.E.S

What I like about this system is the semi-scientific approach. Good tip is to make any decision a quant one. The image above shows a mixed variety, meaning ideas from different stages of the conversion funnel. It's actually best is to focus on one stage every time. 

O - OUTLINE EXPERIMENTS

Now that you have one highest ranked idea, you can start experimenting. Key here is to design a test that will verify whether the specific idea/channel/approach will be a success or failure. Best way to go about this is to build out an experiment sheet.

Minimum viable version:

Minimum Viable Version

• Top ranked idea: Create a popup page after created a lineup to incentivise users to play multiple paid games with one-click

• Research: Currently we have paying users playing 2 paid games per gameday. This popup page will make it much easier to play more

• Hypothesis: By using the popup page to incentivise more paid games, we will increase paid games per user per gameday by 50% and therefore increase average revenue per paying user (ARPPU) by 20%

Maximum viable version:

Top ranked idea: Create a popup page after created a lineup to incentivise users to play multiple paid games with one-click

Maximum Viable Version

Top ranked idea: Create a popup page after created a lineup to incentivise users to play multiple paid games with one-click

• We believe that there will be an increase in paid games because of a popup screen that incentivises users to play more with one-click

• To verify this we will send out a beta version with said integration to our top 5% users - without telling them the update - and analyse their behaviour when prompted

• We will measure number of paid games played (#) and ARPPU (£) to see if there is an increase in either or both due to the integration

• It is a success if we improve the ARPPU by 20%

• Results Quantitative: # paid games played up by 75% and ARPPU up by 33%

• Results Qualitative: users say "very useful", "quick and easy", "organic placement of popup", "much more fun, quick and useful"

• Next steps are to rollout integration and update game 

W - WORK WORK WORK

Rihanna says it best

This the area that separates the men and women from the boys and girls. You can do a number of things to maximise the effectiveness of your work and experiment, however for me, weekly sprints worked best. They really allow you to laser focus on one goal (the experiment) and truly smash it out the park. No excuses. 

S - STUDY DATA

Which pill...?

This is where the insights kick in and you make your growth decisions. This is where the test is verified as either a success or failure.

If you get the analysis wrong, you make the wrong decisions. Therefore you could jeopardise your whole growth model. Which could mean the end of your business, depending on its stage of life. No pressure.

Make sure you understand, record and analyse both quantitative and qualitative data for every experiment. Understanding how the users reacted and felt, matter as much as the data behind their behaviour.

Try to find any differences in user behaviour from before, and ask yourself why this has (or has not) occurred. Does it fit with your original hypothesis? Is this healthy, scalable behaviour?

From all of the data you have acquired and consumed you can now conclude success or failure. And depending on answer, either use the data for further background research in future projects, or use to rollout the experiment company-wide. 

Key tools I used were Fabric.io (for real-time acquisition metrics), Amplitude (for retention, segmenting, behavioural cohorting, data visualisation and Metabase (for all data retrieval and querying). 

RINSE AND REPEAT

Rinse and repeating growth experiments

Even if your first seven experiments fail, you can use the data acquired as more background research for the next seven. This iterating experimentation process theoretically means the more experiments you run the higher value they become (so by experiment 1,273 you'll be pooping gold). 

Remember, rinse and repeat until you find that one core channel that really grows your business. The one that hits the sweet spot. When you do, ride that channel as long as you can, dig deep, iterate and squeeze as much growth as you can out of it until it's fully saturated. 

Then rinse. Then repeat. 

You can find my other musings here, here and here. 

How to Prioritise Your Growth Strategy

Leaky bucket?

In the "4 things I wish I knew when cofounding my startup" essay, one of the advice pieces was that every product is a leaky bucket. Test and optimise all aspects of your product - from onboarding, activation, conversion funnel etc - to make it as 'un-leaky' as possible before you go through this process.

Why? Because it will save you time and money. 

How to prioritise your growth strategy

This is a bullseye - courtesy of myself

As mentioned in my previous essay about the 19 channels for growth, I promised a follow-up piece on how to prioritise them.

The "bullseye" name and framework was coined by Justin Mares and Gabriel Weinberg due to the three-step approach in reaching bullseye and unlocking your growth. This approach helps you prioritise your growth startegy in a qualitative way that provides more insight than just picking a channel out of thin air. You'll see that the way I use the framework differs slightly to theirs, which means there is room for interprotation. 

I think it's also important to note that there are many ways on how to prioritse your growth strategy, this is just one of them, and one that I found very useful at the beginning of my career. I will cover another type of prioritisation down the line, one that has a few more steps in the process but begins with the brainstorming technique from Google.

Bullseye Prep

Who are you targeting?

To preface the prioritisation process you must have an understanding of who you are targeting. If you are pre-product launch with no customer data then you can target and test different hypotheses with different customer profiles (but one at a time). Simply put, hypothesise who they might be, what demographic, where they are, what they consume and what they do.

For example, this is how I started my own customer profile:

• Product = Dribble - daily fantasy football app

• Who = men, 18-21, uni, football fans, premier league, champions league, pub culture, punters, 

• Where = Oxford (started locally, so where I was when started out, as it's always good to find a niche market, no matter how small, to potentially monopolise)

• What they consume: football highlights, football fan pages

• What they do: 5-aside football, season ticket holders, pub culture, FIFA, Pro evo

The One Metric That Matters For Acquisition

Once you have your target customer profile, it's time to understand the one metric that matters (OMTM) for your acquisition. Is it pure installs, registrations, activations, or further down the funnel with revenue or games played / messages sent? The OMTM is different fo every business so really think what your product is trying to do. For Dribble, we targeted activations, so users that have installed, registered and deposited money.

This metric will be your north star, so for every channel you look at you need to think "how is this going to drive [enter your OMTM]?" and then test, optimise and iterate to really maximise results. Focusing on one metric really helps, and advice would be focus on metrics further down the funnel, away from the vanity metrics like installs. 

19 Channels For Growth

Last step in the preparation process is the brainstorm session, which is often the funnest part. The key takeaway here is to take your time with every acquisition channel, don't disregard any and understand one way you can drive acuisition.

E.g. looking at the channel "content marketing", are you going to focus on writing long form content, making a series of infographics, get into podcasts? How will you distribute to acquire the user profile you created at the beginning? Will that be on Medium, reddit, Instagram? 

When brainstorming, always keep in mind your user profile and OMTM. How do you think your user profile will react with that specific acquisition channel, are they known for using said channel, and how will that channel positively affect your OMTM? 

What helped me was listing out all 19 channels for growth on a large white board with space to input where and how you'd use each channel.

19 channels listed

Bullseye Framework

Prioritisaiton

There are three sections in the bullseye framework. The outer ring, the middle ring and the onion ring...only joking, it's the bullseye. 

So once you have all channels listed with ways you can leverage each, think about how relevant / promising / effective each are by rating each channel with 1,2 or 3. 

The priority key

But it's not that simple.

To help prioritise, you can only choose three channels for the bullseye, four for the middle ring and 5 for the outer ring. 

The onion ring structure

At this stage you might have 5 channels with relevance score of 1, so the two channels you don't put in the bullseye will be the first to fill out your middle ring. Then from there you have two spaces for your number 2's, which will then overflow into the outer ring. Get the jist?

Prioritised Bullseye

Testing

Once you have completed the qualitative part of the bullseye diagram it's time to start with the quantitative! Because at the end of the day, data is king and will tell you where to spend your time, money and efforts.  

The first channels you start testing are the innermost. To do so, set aside a small amount of budget with a timeline, for instance, £1k to be allocated to the first three channels in total and run for a month.

At this stage, one or more channels will have started to perform better than the rest. If there is a clear loser(s) after the first month, swap in the equal amount of poor performing channels with ones in the middle ring. If all three are performing relatively similarly, test a little longer to find a statistically significant difference. 

Keep swapping out channels in and out of the bullseye ring - while testing them over the same amount of time and budget - until there is a clear winner. This winner is your core channel and the one you should focus on.

How to keep momentum

The distribution of growth from the 19 channels follows the power law.

Distribution of growth among channels

There really is only one channel at a time that brings in most of the growth. However, you can't rely on that singular channel until the end of time. Each channel has a saturation point.

You need to be able to squeeze every ounce of traction out of your core channel before you move on. To do so, you must focus, dive deep and continually experiment to find out exactly how to optimise growth. You will uncover new and effective tactics and try to scale them until you reach the saturation point. You will know when you've reached that point because growth will have stagnated, no matter what you do, and costs will no longer be sustainable. 

Common Mistakes

We've all been there...

When testing, it's quite common to have multiple channels working but with varying degrees of success. For example, you test online ads, influencer marketing and SEO. They all work well, however, influencer marketing works far better in terms of cost effectiveness and scale, but you elect to keep all three going. This is a common mistake that must be prevented. Really focus and specialise on the singluar channel that works well. 

If no traction channel is significant by the end of testing, then you must go through the framework again. However, this time you'll have data to work with about previous experience, copy, tone of voice, language, creative etc. If you have gone through this process a number of times and still no real results, then you still have a leaky bucket. Fix that first. 

Hope this has helped you in prioritising your growth startegy. It sure helped me.

FYI - after running my growth strategy through bullseye targeting, I found my core channel. It started with social ads, but after saturation point it became, and still is, partnerships. Things move. Don't worry.

... 

If you enjoyed this, catch my other essays on "how I launched my iOS app", how I'd improve it, 19 channels for growth, "4 things I wish I knew when cofounding my startup" and 5 podcasts to listen to. 

5 Podcasts to Listen for Entrepreneurs, Growth Marketers and Tech Enthusiast

When I’m not listening to True Crime podcasts, I’m listening to more uplifting and aspirational ones. Ones that get me talking, thinking and sharing. I believe to be a huge channel of growth for some of these podcasts due to the voume of WOM marketing I do.

With this in mind, I thought I'd make it formal and write a small synopsis on which podcasts you could be listening to to stretch your mind.

1. Recode Decode hosted by Kara Swisher

Recode Decode with Kara Swisher

Why: one of tech's most promininent journalists, Kara Swisher is known for her insightful reporting and straight shooting style. She's also a G. Really gets to the heart of an issue, she's matter-of-fact with a quick sense of humour. The episodes are timely and chat about all recent news, from Uber's sexual harassment, Amazon's purchase of Whole Foods, Trump's America and the state of innovation. 

Episodes:

• What Amazon should buy next (Scott Galloway @ L2 and NYU Prof)

• Venture capital is headed for a "huge, rude awakening" (Chamath Palihapitiya @ Social Capital)

• What tech guys get wrong about harassment (Erica Baker and Sarah Kunst)

• Google is God, Facebook is Love, and Amazon will be worth $1 trillion (Scott Galloway @ L2 and NYU Prof)

• Did Instagram copy Snapchat (Kevin Systrom @ Instagram)

• Silicon Valley should think more like Spider-Man (Reid Hoffman @ Greylock)

Length per episode: 1 hour

2. The Growth Show by Hub Spot

The Growth Show by HubSpot

Why: Podcast for executives, entrepreneurs that shares stories on what it's really like to grow a business, a movement, an idea, or a team. On the shorter side (time, so perfect for a lunch break or commute to work. 

Episodes: 

• Your office is built for extroverts. Here's why that's a problem (Amma Marfo)

• How ClassPass is getting rid of your excuses (Payal Kadaka @ ClassPass)

• Why slow fashion doesn't have to mean slow growth (Kathie Sever @ Fort Lonesome)

Length per episode: 30 mins

3. Growth Marketing Toolbox

Great for new tech

Why: Discover the latest and greatest gorwht marketing tools and technology. Each week, Nicholas Scalice from Earnworthy, interviews marketers, product creators, startup founders, marketing technologists etc to unbox what tech and tools they use (or even make). 

Episode:

• What is behavioural cohorting? (Kris Mobayeni @ BounceX)

• Programmatic advertising and growth hacks (Abdul Hafez)

• Typeform for marketers (director of marketing @ typeform)

• SEO tools and tactics for growth (Darcy Sullivan @ Propel Marketing)

• 20+ growth marketing tools (kieran Daniels @ FieldPulse)

Length per episode: 30 mins

4. Masters of Scale with Reid Hoffman

Reid Hoffman

Why: Quite a comically edited show with lots of sound effects. Aside from that, Reid Hoffman (cofounder @ LinkedIn and Greylock, shares how companies grow from zero to gazillion through interviews with some of techs most influential entrepreneurs. Such as, Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Reed Hastings, Eric Schmidt, Sara Blakely.

Episode:

• Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg in Imperfect is perfect

• Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg in lead, lead again

• Google/Alphabet's Eric Schmidt in Innovation = managed chaos

• Netflix's Reed Hastings in Culture Shock

• Try the BONUS episodes from each interview

Length per episode: 30 mins

5. Zero to Scale: two entrepreneurs take you behind the scenes in a journey to $100k per month and beyond

Zero to scale podcast

Why: full discolsure: I haven't started this podcast yet but I've heard great things and is on the list once I've finished all of the above. It's about two entrepreneurs who take you through their own businesses in real time week by week to share how they are growing it from $0 per month to $20k and beyond. That includes sharing updates on wins, losses and leasons learned. It gives an honest, emotional and transparent view into the growth od two businesses.

Episodes: I'll be following the journey from the beginning

Length per episode: 30-45 mins

If you want to read some of my other musings you can check out "how I launched my iOS app", "how I revised the launch", "4 things I wish I knew when cofounding my startup" and "are there really only 19 channels for growth?"

4 Things I Wish I Knew When Cofounding My Startup

Sharing what I wish I knew when cofounding my startup, Dribble

Brains

When you're in the (startup) trenches its pretty difficult to see over the banks. Not only is there a wall of dirt in front of you, but you are also victim to tunnel-vision. You're working on that integral campaign, feature or creative that NEEDS IMPLEMENTING ASAP, no matter how small it is. In fact, there's so much tunnel vision that the size of said feature or campaign doesn't even register. To you, it's the be-all and end-all. The only thing that matters.

This has happened to me. A lot. Trying to keep an eye on the big picture while getting down and dirty with growth is no easy feat, and I'll be honest, it's still an ongoing battle. 

But, now I'm here writing this essay roughly 2 years after those trenches with the luxury of being able to reflect on what I wish I knew. And oh how it looks so easy from here. How simple, how rudimentary. I have no idea why I struggled so much. 

And that my friends, is why hindsight is 2 things:

1. 20/20 and,

2. a b***h

So here's what my passed self would have loved to know before getting in those trenches. 

1. Your product is a leaky bucket.

No shame in knowing that's what your product looks like. It was the same for me

Plug those holes before you start trying to fill it

Get those rose tinted glasses off and be real. Your product is a leaky bucket when you start off. Before starting to really implement any robust growth strategies, start from the bottom of the funnel - your product. 

Only once in a blue eon does a product overflow with growth because it's bullet proof right off the bat. Snapchat is a prime example of attracting growth and being pretty darn close to bullet proof since launch. However, it wasn't perfect - they still had a lot of work to do. Even if you make the holy grail that shows early signs of no holes and you think will never sink, I'll just say one word, Titanic. 

We thought we had great product at launch, because our beta testers had very healthy behaviour playing multiple games per match-day and creating a small buzz through WOM. But in actual fact, when we formally opened up the doors and turned on a growth tap we saw holes appear. 

On-boarding flow had holes as we asked for people email and phone number (chose this due to other similar product types doing the same), the KYC verification page was a very tough cookie to crack in terms of placement and provider, the journey from registration to game played needing optimizing and finally how users could invite friends to challenge needed addressing. So we had our work cut out for us.

The hard thing was the air of investor pressure - to show signs of early growth and healthy product behavior - was around so I really tried to keep the growth tap on without a whole company effort to optimize the user journeys as quickly as possible. 

What would have helped us is if we segmented our company wide goals to focus on customer journey first (customer surveys/focus groups / analytics etc), prove healthy behaviour and market product fit, then focus on growth. 

It's a constant process and a company-wide objective to get your bucket fixed. Really dig deep into your analytics platform (Amplitude/Mixpanel/Metabase) to find where the holes are and fix them. To help flush out these holes you can run a few growth experiments, such as, controlled Facebook ad testing to pump a few 100-1,000 targeted people into the product to study behaviours. Doing this will:

1. flush out holes in controlled experiment (understand onboarding flows, registration flows, app store conversion, finding the a-ha moment and overall retention)

2. practice your paid advertising techniques

3. help you hypothesize and test new user groups to target

All of the above will set great groundwork for the future growth strategy you will implement.

2. To become the master, you must master the basics

Master the basics you must

It goes without saying, if you want to become a master, you should master the basics. From a growth perspective, the basics aren't growth related. Think Karate Kid and the wax on wax off scene. He's not training to wax a car, he's just practicing his movements which will mimic the way he moves when whooping butts.

With this in mind, the basics of growth are all pillars that intersect with product, data and marketing, namely, behavioural pyschology, branding, storytelling, positioning, design, UX principles, programming, statistics and data analytics.  

Brian Balfour is a G and has great advice in shaping yourself like a T. It is frustratingly true, and I say this because I didn't know this when I started.

Source: Brian Balfour, Coelevate

I, like many people out there, jumped into the channels before truly mastering the basics (similar to how I approached growth before optimsing the user journeys in the product). I started to "master" channels before mastering the driving forces (user behaviours and storytelling behind this). And in using this approach you can never truly master anything. 

So. since I have an honours degree in mathematics, I have a good understanding of statistics and data analysis, so personally, my focus has been on customer behaviours, storytelling, psychologies and design principles. It's been a very enriching experience learning these basics and building on them. I wish I had started learning and mastering these base layers before I cofounded Dribble because I'd be much more advanced in my experience than I am now. 

So, to my past self: "start now because no one ever said "I wish I mastered those skills later". Idiot."

3. Don't try to look for those Quick tricks, hacks or bullets

Hockey stick, not "hacky" stick

Everyone loves a success story. Especially the ones where a startup/founder is praised for using one trick or hack that resulted hyper growth and were shortly after unicornified (is that going to stick...?). They tried things like leveraging Craiglist for growth (Airbnb), integrating contacts and referrals in onboarding (Whatsapp), viral loops (pick one), Facebook Open Graph (one of the early adopters like IamPlyr), or added one feature that started the hockey stick.

I think an inherent reason why we love that concept so much is because you risk a limited amount (time) for maximum gains. Of course I fell victim to this, where I was hell bent on trying to figure out our one trick, or hack that would provide similar growth. 

But growth doesn't work like that. It's a consistent process of experimentation. You need to straddle two mindsets, creative and methodical. Creative in your process of choosing which channels to experiment first (using deductive reasoning and brainstorming) and methodical in how you execute it. An awesome growth process is the G.R.O.W.S process from Growth Tribe. Don't fall into a traditional trap of trying every channel once over a period of time until you find it, as that wastes vital time. 

You need to go through these creative and methodical motions, experiments, and theories to find the 1-2 channels that provide most growth, since it follows the power law. Meaning, only 1-2 channels will provide all of your growth. Could be WOM, SEO, paid ads, sales, content marketing etc. It follows this law because your business should find product-channel fit (more on this in follow up essays) where your product or business integrates intuitively into a specific channel, effectively built for the channel, rather than having the channel built for the product (impossible to do the latter). 

Way's in which I'd deduce channels to try: look at the competitive landscape, what are similar products doing to grow, what works well for them, what doesn't? What are new technologies or platforms that you can leverage for growth? Any blue ocean channels?

4. Keep one foot in the known and one in the unknown

If only learning would be that simple

I have come to understand that learning isn't linear. If you start on date A you are not on an even gradient of learning Y-amount every X-time-frame until you leave on date B. In truth, I see it as being more of a normal distribution, not over time, but rather between areas of known and unknowns, depicted below. 

The learning play ground. Inspired by Brian Balfour

To maximise learning, you need to make a conscience effort where you would like to be on the above graph.

When cofounding Dribble, I made sure to live in the unknown area, because "that's where I'll learn the most". In theory, this is true, because if it is unknown then it can only be known (very profound, I know). So I spent close to 100% of my time on tools, projects and areas I knew nothing about without even a slight understanding of a base layer. 

Alternatively, being at such a high stakes stage of the company it felt counter intuitive to work on things I knew very well already. If you know how to use a tool or understand a topic like the back of your hand then your learning is saturated. 

Clearly, being at either side of the bell shaped curve isn't ideal so one must actively work in a 50/50 capacity between known and unknowns. The closer you are to the 50/50 split the more you learn (depicted by the green area with the victorious icon). One reason being, if you're living in the 100% known, this easily leads to boredom, and if you're living in the 100% unknown, this leads to frustration. Another reason being, you can supplement the unknowns with key learnings from the knowns to help cognitive development. 

I hope that helps! It would have definitely helped my past self. More on my startup journey and reflections you can find my previous essays on how I launched my app and how I'd improve it.